"Why is God considered an explanation for anything? It's not- it's failure to explain, a shrug of the shoulders, an 'I dunno' dressed up in spirituality and ritual. If someone credits something to God, generally what it means is that they haven't a clue, so they're attributing it to an unreachable, unknowable sky-fairy. Ask for an explanation of where that bloke came from, and odds were you'll get a vague, psuedo-philoso
" If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance 'God'".
~Jerry Coyne
The human appendix:
In plant-eating vertebrates, the appendix is much larger and its main function is to help digest a largely herbivorous diet. The human appendix is a small pouch attached to the large intestine where it joins the small intestine and does not directly assist digestion. Biologists believe it is a vestigial organ left behind from a plant-eating ancestor. Interestingly, it has been noted by paleontologist Alfred Sherwood Romer in his text The Vertebrate Body (1949) that the major importance of the appendix "would appear to be financial support of the surgical profession", referring to, of course, the large number of appendectomies performed annually. In 2000, in fact, there were nearly 300,000 appendectomies performed in the United States, and 371 deaths from appendicitis. Any secondary function that the appendix might perform certainly is not missed in those who had it removed before it might have ruptured.
Male breast tissue and nipple:
The subject of male nipples is a sensitive, and maybe confusing, topic to many. Those who wish to invalidate evolutionary theory might pose the question, "Was man descended from woman?" The answer, of course, is no. Both men and women have nipples because in early stages of fetal development, an unborn child is effectively sexless. Nipples are present in both males and females; it is only in a later stage of fetal development that testosterone causes sex differentiatio
Wisdom Teeth:
With all of the pain, time, and money that are put into dealing with wisdom teeth, humans have become just a little more than tired of these remnants from their large jawed ancestors. But regardless of how much they are despised, the wisdom teeth remain, and force their way into mouths regardless of the pain inflicted. There are two possible reasons why the wisdom teeth have become vestigial. The first is that the human jaw has become smaller than its ancestors -and the wisdom teeth are trying to grow into a jaw that is much too small. The second reason may have to do with dental hygiene. A few thousand years ago, it might be common for an 18 year old man to have lost several, probably most, of his teeth, and the incoming wisdom teeth would prove useful. Now that humans brush their teeth twice a day, it's possible to keep one's teeth for a lifetime. The drawback is that the wisdom teeth still want to come in, and when they do, they usually need to be extracted to prevent any serious pain.
The coccyx or Human Tailbone:
These fused vertebrae are the only vestiges that are left of the tail that other mammals still use for balance, communication, and in some primates, as a prehensile limb. As our ancestors were learning to walk upright, their tail became useless, and it slowly disappeared. It has been suggested that the coccyx helps to anchor minor muscles and may support pelvic organs. However, there have been many well documented medical cases where the tailbone has been surgically removed with little or no adverse effects. There have been documented cases of infants born with tails, an extended version of the tailbone that is composed of extra vertebrae. There are no adverse health effects of such a tail, unless perhaps the child was born in the Dark Ages. In that case, the child and the mother, now considered witches, would've been killed instantly.
Erector Pili and Body Hair:
The erector pili are smooth muscle fibers that give humans "goose bumps". If the erector pili are activated, the hairs that come out of the nearby follicles stand up and give an animal a larger appearance that might scare off potential enemies and a coat that is thicker and warmer. Humans, though, don't have thick furs like their ancestors did, and our strategy for several thousand years has been to take the fur off other warm looking animals to stay warm. It's ironic actually that an animal, sensing danger is near, would puff up its coat to look scarier, but the human hunter would see the puffier coat as a warm prize, leaving the thinner haired weaker looking animals alone. Of course, some body hair is helpful to humans; eye brows can keep sweat out of the eyes and facial hair might influence a woman's choice of sexual partner. All the rest of that hair, though, is essentially useless.
"But we are made in his image!"
And yet God gave you a bunch of spare parts, some of which will kill you or cause severe pain and discomfort.
Yes, we were 'designed' broken. Brilliance.
David Hume : " No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that it's also it would be more miraculous than the fact which is endeavors to establish."
Jim Watson : " Well I don't think we're for anything. We're just product of evolution. You can say, "Gee, your life must be pretty bleak if you don't think there's a purpose." but I'm anticipating having a good lunch."
Another argument I detest it's the Ultimate Boeing 747, the premise that the likelihood of life originating on earth without God is no greater than the chance that a hurricane, sweeping 3 scrap yard, would have the luck to assemble a Boeing 747. others have borrow the metaphor to refer to the leader evolution of complex living bodies, where it has spurious plausibility. the odds against assembling a fully functioning horse, bill or ostrich by randomly shopping its parts are up there in 747 territory. This, in a nutshell, is the creationist' favorite argument- an argument that could be made only by somebody who doesn't understand the first thing about natural selection: somebody who thinks natural selection is a theory of chance whereas- in the relevant sense of chance- it is the opposite.
however statistically improbable the entity you seek to explain by invoking a designer, the designer himself has got to be at least as improbable. God is the ultimate Boeing 747.
I personally do test the declaration of," I admit that there's no evidence of God. There's a reason why it's called faith." this last sentence uttered with almost truculent conviction, and no hint of apology or defensiveness. I'm sorry, but in today's day and age of the free exchange of information and ideas, remaining ignorant is a choice. how pretentious, how weak, and unbearably pathetic.
why, in any case, do we so readily accept the idea that the 1 thing you must do you if you want to please God is believing him? what's so special about believing? isn't it just as likely that God will reward kindness, or generosity, or humility? Or sincerity? What if God is a scientist who regards honest seeking after truth as the supreme virtue? Indeed, with the designer the universe have to be a scientist? Bertrand Russell I was asked what he would say he died and found himself confronted by God, demanding to know why Russell have not believe in Him. ' not enough evidence, god, not enough evidence.' was Russell's reply. Might be God respect Russell for is courageous skepticism far more than he will respect Pascal's cowardly hedge-betting?
Pascal's Wager holds that however long the odds against God's existence might be, there is an even larger asymmetry the penalty for guessing wrong. You better believe in God, because you're right you stand to gain eternal bliss and if you're wrong it won't make any difference anyway. On the other hand, if you don't believe in God you turn out to be wrong you get a turtle damnation, where as if you're right it makes the difference. On the face of it, the decision is no brainer. however, there is something distinctly on about the argument. believing is not something you can decide to do as a matter of policy. Pascal's wager could only ever be an argument for feeding believe in God. And the guy that you claim to believe in had better not be the on Mission kind or heat see through the deception.
"An amusing, if rather pathetic, case study, in miracles is the Great Prayer Experiment: does praying for patients help them recover? Prayers are commonly offered for sick people, both privately and in formal places of worship. Darwin's cousin, Francis Galton was the first to analyse scientifically whether praying for people is efficacious. He noted that every Sunday, in churches throughout Britain, entire congregations prayed publicly for the health of the royal family. Shouldn't they, therefore, be unusually fit, compared with the rest of us, who are prayed for only by our nearest and dearest? Galton looked into it, and found no statistical differentiatio
More recently, the physicist Russell Stannard (one of three well-known religious scientists...) has thrown his weight behind an initiative, funded by - of course - the Templeton Foundation, to test experimentally the proposition that praying for sick patients improves their health.
Such experiments, if done properly, have to be double blind, and this standard was strictly observed. The patients were assigned, strictly at random, to an experimental group (received prayers), or a control (received no prayers). Neither the patients, nor their doctors or caregivers, nor the experimenters were allowed to know which patients were being prayed for and which patients were the controls. Those who did the experimental praying had to know the names of the individuals for whom they were praying - otherwise, in what sense would be praying for them rather than for somebody else? But care was taken to tell them only the first name and initial letter of the surname. Apparently, that would be enough to enable God to pinpoint the right hospital bed.
...
Valiantly shouldering aside all mockery, the team of researchers soldiered on, spending $2.4 million in Templeton money under the leadership of Dr. Herbert Benson, a cardiologist at the Mind/Body Medical Institute near Boston. Dr. Benson was earlier quoted in a Templeton press release as 'believing that evidence for the efficacy of intercessory prayer in medicinal settings is mounting'. Reassuringly, then, the research was in good hands, unlikely to be spoiled by sceptical vibrations. Dr. Benson and his team monitored 1,802 patients at six hospitals, all of whom received coronary bypass surgery. The patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 received prayers and didn't know it. Group 2 (the control group) received no prayers and didn't know it. Group 3 received prayers and did know it. The comparison between Groups 1 and 2 tests for the efficacy of intercessory prayer. Group 3 tests for possible psychosomatic effects of knowing that one is being prayed for.
Prayers were delivered by the congregations of three churches, one in Minnesota, one in Massachusetts, and one in Missouri, all distant from the three hospitals. The praying individuals, as explained, were given only the first name and initial letter of the surname of each patient for whom they were to pray. It is good experimental practice to standardize as far as possible, and they were all, accordingly, told to include in their prayers the phrase, 'for a successful surgery with a quick, healthy recovery and no complications.
The results, reported in the American Heart Journal of April 2006, were clear cut. There was no difference between those patients who were prayed for and those who were not. What a surprise. There was a difference between those who KNEW they had been prayed for and those who did not know one way or another; but it went in the wrong direction. Those who knew they had been the beneficiaries of prayer suffered significantly more complications than those who did not. Was God doing some smiting, to show his disapproval of the whole barmy enterprise? It seems more probable that those patients who knew they were being prayed for suffered additional stress in consequence: 'Performance anxiety', as the experimenters put it."
~Excerpt from Richard Dawkin's book The God Delusion
"Some people have views of God that are so broad and flexible that it is inevitable that they will find God wherever they look for him. One hears it said that ' God is the ultimate', or ' God is our better naturenature' or ' God is the universe.' Of course, like any other word, the word 'god' can be given any meaning we like. If you want to say that 'god is energy', then you can find God in a lump of coal."
- Nobel-prize winning physicist Steven Weinberg
"When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion."
-Robert M. Pirsig
Vegetarians are fucking hypocrites. If you care THAT strongly for the lives of all animals, then you should care about the lives of the plants, fungi, and microscopic animals you kill by the thousands every day. Give and take is the LAW of life on this planet, and it is impossible for you to live without killing something. a few hundred bacteria and viruses just died in your GI tract and there's nothing you can do about it.
They're also as stupid as creationists. You have a doctrine that you follow that somehow our design is wrong and you go against the natural order. Open your mouth in a mirror. See those canines, bicuspids and incisors? They are for TEARING FLESH. Now prick your finger and run your blood through a DNA spectral analyzer. See all those blueprints for protein-unlock
Homo Sapiens are omnivores. We need fruits, vegetables, AND animal meats to live the way we were meant to by nature. It is also a scientific fact that our transition into becoming meat eaters is how we became as smart as we are--it allowed our brains to condense and hold more surface area with less volume. Without having eaten meat we wouldn't have picked up enough gray matter to make tools, and without coats, claws or refined senses, we'd be completely extinct.
and above all, you're LOUD.
Shut the fuck up about your life choices already. Do what you want, but don't think you have any right to shove your CousCous down other peoples' throats. In certain regards you idiots are worse than PeTA and religious psychos. Do what you will, but if you try to take steak off my plate, know that YOU are the next nearest thing made of meat, and I INTEND to get my meat ration.
Someone posted this on Facebook and my response was not well-received.
" Current studies show that over thirty percent of returning soldiers have PTSD. Because of this, sad though that may be, the majority of veterans who cannot find employment (roughly 84% of the unemployed have PTSD according to the 2011 national survey) are those with PTSD because they cannot afford treatment, the treatment does not work or works with a limited effect, or they refuse treatment altogether. PTSD-stricken soldiers are prone to moderate to severe depression, anxiety, societal disassociation
So. This moron is saying we should take these men, the MAJORITY of which have anxiety, anger issues, have a heightened sensitivity and reaction to loud noises and similar phenomena, and, for many of them, don't have a strong will to live anymore, arm them, and put them in schools near rowdy, boisterous children?
Yeah, whoever wrote this is writing from their patriotism- and emotion-blinde
Also, interesting fact, many soldiers who go into the military as Christians leave as atheists. So, yeah, "Keep God in America" isn't a viewpoint shared by the soldiers you support.
Just sayin'."
I wonder why they got mad...
"Satan is among us, tonight, friends. Can you see the fire? Can you see the Brimstone? Get down on your knees! Get down on your knees and crawl like the filthy beasts you have become. Back into the pit! Back into the caves! Put the bible to your head, and pull the trigger! The Lord requests and so he shall receive! Glory! Glory!"
Zechariah 14:12
And the LORD will send a plague on all the nations that fought against Jerusalem. Their people will become like walking corpses, their flesh rotting away. Their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongues will rot in their mouths.
Zechariah 14:13
On that day they will be terrified, stricken by the LORD with great panic. They will fight their neighbors hand to hand.
There are several other biblical passages that allude to a plague that will decimate mankind in the end times.
Many people take the bible as the truth, and also see it as a book of prophecy. Could we have received warning of the impending rising of the undead from antiquity? We don’t have to go far to rationalize this. Prophets in ancient times may have seen exactly what happened, but didn’t understand the science behind it to describe it accurately. They may have seen the biological cause engineered in a lab and unleashed upon the world, but could only use simple words to describe it.
There are currently so many end times prophecies that it can make your head spin. Almost all of them don’t point to an exact cause of the apocalypse, but the bible seems to point to the undead several times
Revelation 11:6
These men have power to shut up the sky so that it will not rain during the time they are prophesying; and they have power to turn the waters into blood and to strike the earth with every kind of plague as often as they want.
Revelation 11:8
Their bodies will lie in the street of the great city, which is figuratively called Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified.
Revelation 11:11
But after the three and a half days a breath of life from God entered them, and they stood on their feet, and terror struck those who saw them.
Ezekiel 37:10
So I prophesied as he commanded me, and breath entered them; they came to life and stood up on their feet–a vast army.
The bible is rife with resurrection, the dead coming to life, and stories and illiterations to the end of times. Perhaps, the plague God uses to wipe the earth clean is a plague of Zombies. You can also point to end times prophecy references of Locusts and say that zombies could also be considered as a locust, devouring all life. At this point, all we can do is speculate and prepare. We don’t know how or when the world will end, but we can be ready if it is survivable.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
The name Utopia is a pun meaning both the "good place" and "no place".
"The first thing you must understand is that the One True world is not a figment of your imagination, it does not lie in some faraway dimension. To help you understand the relationship between the True World and the False, you must envision the True World lying beneath the False, as a man can lay hidden beneath a blanket, or a woman's true face can be hidden by an exquisite mask.
The Illusion that hides the True World from the eyes of living men is called the Modern World. It is a dense weave of illusory strands called facts, together composing the Grand Veil of Reason.
The True Philosopher, through dedication and study, comes to realize that Reason is a lie because it is Passion that fuels the universe; that Modernity is a falsehood because the Ancient world has never gone away. It only transforms and evolves, and is never any less Ancient. By meditating on the nature of the One True World, one may cause it to manifest, as Truth always overcomes Illusion, even if buried for eons.
One must master these principles to tear aside the dense fabric of illusion and completely understand the One True World."
"He thought of the ancient legends of Ultimate Chaos, at whose centre sprawls the blind idiot god Azathoth, Lord of All Things, encircled by his flopping horde of mindless and amorphous dancers, and lulled by the monotonous piping of a daemoniac flute held in nameless paws."
-The Haunter in the Dark
"Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise, every expanded prospect." (James Madison, in a letter to William Bradford, April 1, 1774)
"I shall have liberty to think for myself without molesting others or being molested myself." (Edwin S. Gaustad, Faith of Our Fathers: Religion and the New Nation, San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987, p. 88. The Adams quote is from his letter to Richard Cranch, August 29, 1756.)
"God is dead" - Nietze
"You may also purchase the children of temporary residents who live among you, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property," - The Hly Bibble, condoning slavery
“In some remote corner of the universe scintillating, scattered in innumerable solar systems, there was once a star on which clever animals invented knowledge. It was the arrogant and deceitful minute of “world history”: but, after all, was only a minute. After a brief breath of nature the star came back rigid and intelligent animals had to die. ”
F. Nietzsche
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason" -Benjamin Franklin
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful." — Edward Gibbon
"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" ~ Epicurus
"The essential Saltes of Animals May be so prepared and preserved, that an ingenious Man may have the whole Ark of Noah in his Studie, and raise the fine Shape of an Animal out of its Ashes at his Pleasure; and by the lyke Method from the essential Saltes of humane Dust, a Philosopher may, without any criminal Necromancy, call up the Shape of any dead Ancestour from the Dust whereinto his Bodie has been incinerated." - Borellus