Myth: The "Greatest Generation" of World War II Was Better Than Later Generations
As Tom Brokaw will gladly tell you for the low, low price of $16.95, the Americans who fought in World War II were "the Greatest Generation." The men of that era were, quite simply, special. After all, a man doesn't grow up during the Great Depression and breaststroke across the Atlantic to crotch-punch the Nazi hordes into submission just to wind up some shiftless pot smoking hippie, like their ungrateful kids.
Why It's Bullshit:
The Greatest Generation was just like you, had you been forced to serve in a monstrously destructive war. In other words, they were scared shitless and miserable.
Big emphasis on "forced," because no matter how many times we're told that the Greatest Generation went to war because it was "the right thing to do," it doesn't change the fact that two-thirds of the U.S. servicemen were drafted. But we're told that the Greatest Generation was different from those who've come since, and in a way that's true -- because two-thirds of the men who fought in Vietnam volunteered.
Only partly because 'Nam's such an awesome vacation destination.
World War II's draft dodging numbers dwarf both Vietnam's and World War I's. Desertion rates between World War II and Vietnam were pretty much neck and neck. And when they weren't dodging or deserting, the Greatest Generation was doing the third best thing: getting completely shitfaced. Soldiers in Vietnam took a lot of heat for drug abuse, but the Greatest Generation was dying of alcohol poisoning so fast that the U.S. Army started putting up warning billboards displaying the "Deaths from Poison Liquor to Date" (G.I.s weren't picky about their booze and often drank methanol -- aka antifreeze). Not to be outdone, creative sailors sometimes swilled the alcohol that fueled torpedoes. When the U.S. Navy caught on and started putting additives in the "torpedo juice" to make the soldiers sick if they drank it, the submariners one-upped them and learned the art of distillation via torpedo engine.
The lesson here is: Never underestimate the resourcefulnes
Read more: http://www.cra
Research Articles, Evidence and Videos that Prove a Historical jesus, NEVER Existed
The Official jesus Challenge: http://tmblr.c
The jesus Birther Movement (jBM) Research Database Directory
http://tmblr.c
https://www.fa
Debunking the Fraudulent christian Apologist List of Extra-biblical but non-contempora
http://tmblr.c
66 Famous Historians and Writers From The 1st and 2nd Century, Who Never Mentioned Fictional jesus – The Screaming Silence of Real History
http://tmblr.c
Refuting John Meier’s “Minor Figure jesus” claims and excuses, attempting to explain away the fact that nobody in Early Antiquity, mentioned jesus.
http://tmblr.c
The bible claims that fictional jesus was one of the Most Famous people of the 1st century, with tens of thousands of followers – The New Testament is the ONLY Source for jesus.
http://tmblr.c
Exposing the Fictional Character of St. Paul the Apostle AKA Saul of Tarsus: Murdering Terrorist, Hallucinating Homophobe, and Evil Misogynist – Who wrote 13-14 of the 27 NT Books.
http://tmblr.c
Jesus Myth - The Case Against Historical Christ - By the famous bible scholar: R.G. Price
http://rationa
Jesus Myth Part II - Follow-up, Commentary, and Expansion - By the famous bible scholar: Robert Price
http://www.rat
http://www.inf
http://www.rob
Many believe Jesus Christ was a real person, why?
http://truth-s
http://stage.i
Did a historical Jesus exist?
http://www.nob
Rejection of Pascal’s Wager - Jesus
http://www.rej
Jesus Did Not Exist?
http://www.vex
The Historical Evidence For Jesus.
http://rosarub
Did Jesus Really Exist? - Mark Thomas
http://www.god
Did a historical Jesus exist?
http://mukto-m
The Truth About “Jesus Christ”
http://www.exp
Deep research - The true story of the real Jesus
http://www.naz
Jesus Christ the Man: Does the Physical Evidence Hold Up?
http://www.lif
Evidence for the historical existence of Jesus Christ
http://rationa
Detoxifying Self-Deception
It can be proven Jesus Christ never existed, and your preacher can’t prove ‘He’ did
http://rense.c
http://www.bib
Did he actually exist? Part 1-2: Range of views. Skeptics. Indicators of existence & non-existence.
http://www.rel
http://www.rel
Proof #50 - Ask Jesus to appear
http://godisim
Is Jesus Christ a Myth?
http://www.pat
http://www.pat
http://www.pat
Choking on the Camel Part 1-2
http://www.pat
http://www.pat
No Unbiased Evidence for Jesus Existence - All the evidence for Jesus is biblical and the evidence outside the Bible makes a strong case for Jesus having being made up
http://www.chr
http://www.chr
http://www.chr
http://www.chr
Was Jesus a Real Person or Just a Figment of Human Imagination
http://www.dei
Do Ossuaries Claimed for St. James and St. Peter Prove a Historical Jesus?
http://debunki
Jesus Never Existed at All
http://www.ath
What If Jesus Never Existed?
http://thehear
Was there a real Jesus?
http://www.dou
http://mama.in
http://www.chr
Do Any First Century Historians Mention the Jesus of Christianity?
http://freetho
History’s Troubling Silence About Jesus by Lee Salisbury (3 places to read this)
http://mnathei
http://www.dis
http://www.inf
EARLY JEWISH WRITERS AND THEIR SILENCE CONCERNING A HISTORICAL JESUS - Hebrew For “The House Of Truth”
Craig M. Lyons Ms.D., D.D., M.Div.
http://theanci
Caseagainstfai
http://www.cas
REFUTING MISSIONARIES by Hayyim ben Yehoshua
PART 1: THE MYTH OF THE HISTORICAL JESUS
http://mama.in
~Kenneth Humphreys
Welcome to Enlightenment! – Religion: the Tragedy of Mankind.
http://www.jes
Fabricating the Jesus Story – Exposing the Fictional Actors/Writers
http://tmblr.c
53 Videos:
https://www.yo
~Earl Doherty
Was There No Historical Jesus? THE JESUS PUZZLE
http://jesuspu
http://jesuspu
http://jesuspu
http://jesuspu
http://jesuspu
http://jesuspu
http://jesuspu
THE JESUS THE JEWS NEVER KNEW
http://jesuspu
THE JESUS PUZZLE - Pieces in a Puzzle of Christian Origins
http://www.jes
Responses to Critiques of the Mythicist Case
Alleged Scholarly Refutations of Jesus Mythicism
http://jesuspu
~Truth Be Known - Bible Scholar - Acharya S - D.M. Murdock
http://www.tru
http://www.exa
Bible Scholar - Acharya S - D.M. Murdock - The Origins of Christianity and the Quest for the Historical Jesus Christ
http://www.tru
Bible Scholar - Acharya S - D.M. Murdock - The Christ Conspiracy: The Greatest Story Ever Sold
http://www.tru
~Freethoughtpe
Did Jesus really exist?
http://www.fre
http://www.fre
http://www.fre
http://www.fre
http://dougsha
~Infidels.org
Historicity Of Jesus FAQ - Scott Oser
http://www.inf
Did Jesus Christ Really Live? Marshall J. Gauvin
http://www.inf
The Truth About Jesus. Is He A Myth?
http://www.inf
Josh McDowell’s “Evidence” for Jesus - Is It Reliable?
http://www.inf
The Jesus of History was written in a book called “Evidence That Demands a Verdict” by Josh McDowell. Here is A Reply to Josh McDowell by: Gordon Stein, Ph.D.
http://www.inf
Josh McDowell’s “Evidence” for Jesus - Is It Reliable? by Jeffery Jay Lowder
http://www.inf
~Bible Scholar - Dr. Richard Carrier
Questioning the Historicity of Jesus by Dr. Richard Carrier
http://www.str
Jesus Studies: http://www.ric
Two Examples of Faulty Bible Scholarship - Richard Carrier
http://www.inf
Was Christianity Too Improbable to be False? - Richard Carrier
http://www.inf
Why I Don’t Buy the Resurrection Story - Richard Carrier
http://www.inf
The Richard Carrier Library
http://www.inf
~Frank R. Zindler
DID JESUS EXIST?
http://www.web
Robert M. Price INTERVIEWS Frank Zindler - The Christ Myth
http://www.poi
The Jesus the Jews Never Knew: Sepher Toldoth Yeshu and the Quest of the Historical Jesus in Jewish Sources BY Frank R. Zindler
http://www.ama
~Thomas Brodie
Brodie on Jesus by Richard Carrier
http://freetho
Beyond the Quest for the Historical Jesus—Book review (Pt. 1-3)
http://www.myt
http://www.myt
http://www.myt
Beyond the Quest for the Historical Jesus: Memoir of a Discovery
http://www.ama
~Rene Salm
http://www.myt
The Myth Of Nazareth: The Invented Town Of Jesus - Paperback
Frank R. Zindler (Editor)
http://www.ama
Did the city of Nazareth even exist during the claimed life of fictional jesus?
http://tmblr.c
~Thomas Verenna
Did Jesus Exist? The Trouble with Certainty in Historical Jesus Scholarship
http://www.aca
~Thomas L. Thompson
Is This Not the Carpenter?: The Question of the Historicity of the Figure of Jesus
http://www.ama
The Messiah Myth: The Near Eastern Roots of Jesus and David
http://www.ama
~Tom Harpur
On The Pagan Roots Of Christianity
http://www.you
~Harold Leidner
The Fabrication of the Christ Myth
http://www.ama
~Iron Chariots Wiki
Jesus Christ
http://wiki.ir
Existence of Jesus
http://wiki.ir
Mythicism
http://wiki.ir
~Rational Response Squad
http://www.rat
http://www.rat
http://www.rat
~Atheists.org
Did Jesus Even Exist?
http://www.ath
Jesus Myth
http://www.ath
How Jesus Got a Life
http://www.ath
Where Jesus Never Walked
http://www.ath
Was Jesus a Jew?
http://www.ath
~Derek Murphy
http://www.jes
http://www.aca
~G.A. Wells
Earliest Christianity (1999)
Professor G.A. Wells continues the debate about the origins of Jesus and the development of Christianity. Drawing on the writings of recent theologians and historians and alluding to his latest book, The Jesus Myth, he throws light on the early history of Christianity.
G. A. Wells Replies to Criticisms of his Books on Jesus (2000)
Professor Wells replies to Rev. Neals’ attacks on his position.
A Reply to J. P. Holding’s ‘Shattering’ of My Views on Jesus and an Examination of the Early Pagan and Jewish References to Jesus (2000)
Wells replies to Holding’s attacks, showing how Holding has misunderstood his position. Wells also defends his position on the early Pagan and Jewish references to Jesus.
A Resurrection Debate: The New Testament Evidence in Evangelical and in Critical Perspective (2000)
Professor Wells’ commentary on the debate between Gary Habermas and Antony Flew on the resurrection of Jesus.
http://www.inf
image
~Videos
David Fitzgerald Skepticon 3 “Examining the Existence of a Historical Jesus”
http://www.you
Funny - Jesus Never Existed - Dusty Smith
http://www.you
Richard Carrier: The Historicity of Jesus ► 33:05 http://www.you
“Did Jesus Exist?” Skepticon 2 Redux Richard Carrier ► 59:56 http://www.you
TTA Podcast 101 - Did Jesus Exist (with Dr. Richard Carrier) ► 57:19 http://www.you
Richard Carrier’s Bayesian Challenge to Jesus Studies ► 26:27 http://www.you
Why I Think Jesus Didn’t Exist: A Historian Explains the Evidence That Changed His Mind ► 60:05
http://www.you
Robert M Price - Jesus myth in Mark’s Gospel http://www.you
Robert Price - The Case Against The Case For Christ http://www.you
Sam Harris weighs in on Historicity of Jesus http://www.thi
Sam Harris - Believing Reason - Aspen Ideas Festival http://www.you
Religion Soup: Dr. Bart Ehrman and Dr. Craig Evans debate the question “Does the New Testament present a reliable portrait of the historical Jesus?” The first evening of the debate took place Jan 19, 2012 at St. Mary’s University. 2 hours and 16 minutes
https://www.yo
This second evening of the debate took place Jan 20, 2012 at Acadia University. 1 hour and 57 minutes.
https://www.yo
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah http://www.you
Did Jesus Exist? The Atheist Experience http://www.you
The Existence of Jesus - Christopher Hitchens http://www.you
The True Core Of The Jesus Myth - Christopher Hitchens http://www.you
Christianity Exposed (Part III: The Jesus Myth) http://www.you
Proving that Jesus is imaginary http://whywont
The Jesus Debate http://www.you
~Making a Messiah 1-8
Making a Messiah, Pt. 1 (What do we know about the NT authors?)
http://www.you
Making a Messiah, Pt. 2 (Old Testament interpretation)
http://www.you
Making a Messiah, Pt. 3 (Messiah who missed the mark)
http://www.you
Making a Messiah, Pt. 4 (The not-so-good news)
http://www.you
Making a Messiah, Pt. 5 (Sacrifice denied)
http://www.you
Making a Messiah, Pt. 6 (The second coming - coming soon!)
http://www.you
Making a Messiah, Pt. 7 (Was Jesus a false prophet?)
http://www.you
Making a Messiah, Pt. 8 (Disciples who suffered and died for a lie)
http://www.you
~Jesus Has Left the Building 1-5
Jesus Has Left the Building, Part 1 (The Bible)
http://www.you
Jesus Has Left the Building, Part 2 (Josephus and the Talmud)
http://www.you
Jesus Has Left the Building, Part 3 (Tacitus, Suetonius, and Pliny)
http://www.you
Jesus Has Left the Building, Part 4 (Celsus, Lucian, and Thallus)
http://www.you
Jesus Has Left the Building, Part 5 (Objections)
http://www.you
image
~TruthSurge: Excavating The Empty Tomb (beyond a reasonable doubt) PART 1-18 (37 VIDEOS)
Part 1-8
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
Part 9 A&B
http://www.you
http://www.you
Part 10
http://www.you
Part 11 A&B
http://www.you
http://www.you
Part 12 A&B
http://www.you
http://www.you
Part 13 A&B
http://www.you
http://www.you
Part 14 A-D
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
Part 15 A-F
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
Part 16 A-G
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
http://www.you
Part 17 A&B
http://www.you
http://www.you
Part 18
http://www.you
Take The Official jesus Challenge here: https://www.fa
The jesus Birther Movement (jBM) Research Database Directory http://tmblr.c
https://www.fa
http://www.fac
Pics: https://www.fa
https://www.fa
Please Join Pages In Our ExposingReligi
http://exposin
Replacing the fraudulent-com
http://www.fac
See an organized listing of ALL of our research blogs:
http://tmblr.c
Huh, finally someone explained it.
"'cis' is a Latin prefix, and was traditionally used in chemistry. It means 'here' or 'on the same side of'
'trans' is a prefix which means 'across' or 'on the other side'
so a cisgendered person would be someone whose sex and gender match. Whereas a trans person would not."
"Every year, I try to do at least two things with my students at least once. First, I make a point of addressing them as “philosophers” – a bit cheesy, but hopefully it encourages active learning.
Secondly, I say something like this: “I’m sure you’ve heard the expression ‘everyone is entitled to their opinion.’ Perhaps you’ve even said it yourself, maybe to head off an argument or bring one to a close. Well, as soon as you walk into this room, it’s no longer true. You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to what you can argue for.”
A bit harsh? Perhaps, but philosophy teachers owe it to our students to teach them how to construct and defend an argument – and to recognize when a belief has become indefensible.
The problem with “I’m entitled to my opinion” is that, all too often, it’s used to shelter beliefs that should have been abandoned. It becomes shorthand for “I can say or think whatever I like” – and by extension, continuing to argue is somehow disrespectful. And this attitude feeds, I suggest, into the false equivalence between experts and non-experts that is an increasingly pernicious feature of our public discourse.
The Conversation
Firstly, what’s an opinion?
Plato distinguished between opinion or common belief (doxa) and certain knowledge, and that’s still a workable distinction today: unlike “1+1=2” or “there are no square circles,” an opinion has a degree of subjectivity and uncertainty to it. But “opinion” ranges from tastes or preferences, through views about questions that concern most people such as prudence or politics, to views grounded in technical expertise, such as legal or scientific opinions.
You can’t really argue about the first kind of opinion. I’d be silly to insist that you’re wrong to think strawberry ice cream is better than chocolate. The problem is that sometimes we implicitly seem to take opinions of the second and even the third sort to be unarguable in the way questions of taste are. Perhaps that’s one reason (no doubt there are others) why enthusiastic amateurs think they’re entitled to disagree with climate scientists and immunologists and have their views “respected.”
Meryl Dorey is the leader of the Australian Vaccination Network, which despite the name is vehemently anti-vaccine. Ms. Dorey has no medical qualifications
So what does it mean to be “entitled” to an opinion?
If “Everyone’s entitled to their opinion” just means no-one has the right to stop people thinking and saying whatever they want, then the statement is true, but fairly trivial. No one can stop you saying that vaccines cause autism, no matter how many times that claim has been disproven.
But if ‘entitled to an opinion’ means ‘entitled to have your views treated as serious candidates for the truth’ then it’s pretty clearly false. And this too is a distinction that tends to get blurred.
On Monday, the ABC’s Mediawatch program took WIN-TV Wollongong to task for running a story on a measles outbreak which included comment from – you guessed it – Meryl Dorey. In a response to a viewer complaint, WIN said that the story was “accurate, fair and balanced and presented the views of the medical practitioners and of the choice groups.” But this implies an equal right to be heard on a matter in which only one of the two parties has the relevant expertise. Again, if this was about policy responses to science, this would be reasonable. But the so-called “debate” here is about the science itself, and the “choice groups” simply don’t have a claim on air time if that’s where the disagreement is supposed to lie.
Mediawatch host Jonathan Holmes was considerably more blunt: “there’s evidence, and there’s bulldust,” and it’s no part of a reporter’s job to give bulldust equal time with serious expertise.
The response from anti-vaccinati
So next time you hear someone declare they’re entitled to their opinion, ask them why they think that. Chances are, if nothing else, you’ll end up having a more enjoyable conversation that way."
Have you ever wondered what might happen to your body in space without a spacesuit? Is it really as dramatic as the movies make it out to be? Would you literally EXPLODE? Could you survive?
On Earth, we live a pretty cozy existence thanks to our protective atmosphere. It shields us from the Sun’s harmful UV rays, regulates temperatures and also maintains a nice atmospheric pressure. The vacuum of space, however, is much more hostile. Without this lovely thick atmospheric blanket, you’re exposed to all sorts of things.
The most serious dangers of exposure to outer space are a lack of oxygen and ebullism. Ebullism is the formation of bubbles in body fluids due to a reduction in ambient pressure. The pressure in the vacuum of space is so low that the boiling point of the fluids in your body decreases below the body’s normal temperature (37oC), which results in the formation of gas bubbles in your fluids that can really mess you up. You’ll swell up pretty bad, perhaps even up to twice your normal size, but you won’t explode as your skin is very stretchy. Your blood will also not boil. You will, of course, be in an immense amount of pain and your blood circulation will be impeded.
As mentioned, the other serious danger is a lack of oxygen. After around 15 seconds, your body would have used up all of the oxygen in your body and you’d lose consciousness. Some of you may be thinking “But I can hold my breath for minutes!” The situation in space is a little different than here on Earth due to the lack of outside pressure, and if you held your breath in space without a suit you’d be in a big trouble. This is because any remaining air would rapidly expand, rupturing the lungs.
After losing consciousness, you’ll probably last a couple of minutes maximum before you die. Of course, there’s all that nasty UV from the Sun which is going to give you horrific sunburn. UV and other high energy photons (X-rays and gamma radiation) would also damage the heck out of your DNA, leading to mutations that would likely cause cancer (if you survived). It’s also typically extremely cold, but you wouldn’t instantly freeze as the vacuum would cause heat to transfer away from the body very slowly.
In sum- you’d swell up, burn, mutate, pass out and your lungs might explode. Lovely. But don’t worry, if you’re ever in this sticky situation, you’ve probably got a solid minute or two to be rescued before you die, so chin up.
There is now a new hashtag, goes by '#ifiwereaboy'
It's essentially a variation to the 'I need feminism because' theme. Funny, because when women spun around and posted 'I DON'T need feminism' sign pictures, they were heckled and told they were being juvenile for writing messages on signs. So, now they are doing it again, but it's different now!
Except it's the same.
And it's the same exact bullshit.
'#ifiwereaboy I wouldn't give people PTSD because of gender' (which is insulting and crude to compare whiny-hurt feelings with PTSD)
'#ifiwereaboy I'd put the seat down' (Men put it up, women put it down, but I guess that back and forth can be ignored)
'#ifiwereaboy I'd educate myself about feminism' (Although everything we learn about feminism we learn from feminists)
'#ifiwereaboy I'd treat women as people who deserve to be respected' (First off, respect is earned, second off, not all men treat women like garbage.)
'#ifiwereaboy I'd take the time to have a conversation' (Because no men take the time to have conversations)
It's just another wave of ludicrous radical nonsense and it makes me grind my teeth.
"The Second Law of Thermodynamics says that systems must become more disordered over time. Living cells therefore could not have evolved from inanimate chemicals, and multicellular life could not have evolved from protozoa.
This argument derives from a misunderstandi
Fuck Creationists who use this bullshit line.
The Second Law actually states that the total entropy of a closed system (one that no energy or matter leaves or enters) cannot decrease. Entropy is a physical concept often casually described as disorder, but it differs significantly from the conversational use of the word.
More important, however, the Second Law permits parts of a system to decrease in entropy as long as other parts experience an offsetting increase. Thus, our planet as a whole can grow more complex because the sun pours heat and light onto it, and the greater entropy associated with the sun's nuclear fusion more than rebalances the scales. Simple organisms can fuel their rise toward complexity by consuming other forms of life and nonliving materials.
"Why should I deign to acknowledge you, a former lackey of a shrivelled corpse who comes begging to my master because of some pathetic tantrum? No, you are nothing to me, as insignificant as a raindrop in a storm."
-Prince Darcentile VI, Paragon of Slaanesh
The headless horseman rides tonight
through stark and starless skies.
Shattering the silence
with his otherworldly cries,
he races through the darkness
on his alabaster steed.
The headless horseman rides tonight where the fates would lead.
The headless horseman rides tonight
begarbed in robes of black
to bear a being from the earth
never to bring him back.
He is evil’s foul embodiment,
with laughter on his breath.
The headless horseman rides tonight,
The minister of death.
The headless horseman rides tonight,
he rides the wind alone.
Beneath his arm he tightly tucks his head of gleaming bone.
His voice is harsh and hollow,
it is horrible to hear.
The headless horseman rides tonight
to fill the earth with fear.
The headless horseman rides tonight
upon his fateful trip.
With silvery scythe of steely death
held fast in bony grip,
he sweeps it swiftly forth and back
as over the earth he glides.
And none in the world is safe tonight
for the headless horseman rides.
—from The Headless Horseman Rides Tonight - More Poems to Trouble Your Sleep by Jack Prelutsky, illustrated by Arnold Lobel
"Shut up. Shut the fuck up. Take stock of your fucks, Byron, and be sure to shut them immediately, because I swear to God there's a storm coming, you hear me? There's a god damn typhoon bearing down on you right now with a righteous fucking fury. So you batten down those fucks, okay? You keep 'em closed up real tight, and you just be as quiet as you can be. You concentrate on getting me back where I can see as fast as you can, without bashing my fucking shin-bones to pudding in the process. Or else I swear to Christ, as soon as I can see again, I will hold your prissy head underwater so long it'll make a giant batch of asshole tea out of the entire fucking reservoir."
"But religion doesn't do anything bad!"
Well...yeah, apparently it does.
http://www.ifl
Internet activism -- particularly with the weird culture that seems to pervade Tumblr -- isn't about making a difference, or even raising awareness; it's just about proving how superior the writer is to his or her audience. Tumbloggers (or whatever you call them) with blogs like Shutthefuckups
According to Tor Wager, associate professor of psychology and neuroscience at CU-Boulder and probable Star Wars character: "Right now, there's no clinically acceptable way to measure pain and other emotions other than to ask a person how they feel."
Male privilege is being condemned to 3 times the sentence that a woman would for the same crime.
Male privilege is sustaining 97% of the combat deaths in the military.
Male privilege is being denied the right to a paternity test in Europe and India, but still having to pay child support.
Male privilege is having only 2 shelters for battered men in the U.S.
Male privilege is continuously being blamed for committing the most abuse against children, sexual or violent, when studies say that women are the most common culprits.
Male privilege is having the court system favor women in regards to divorce, rape charges and allegations, and child custody, regardless of how unfit the mother is for being the parent.
Male privilege is having to explain that, while most CEOs are male, the number of ditch diggers, truck drivers, and menial labor workers are far greater, but somehow that's perfectly fine.
Male privilege is being unable to defend yourself if a woman attacks you.
Male privilege is being arrested if you call the police because your wife or girlfriend attacked you with a weapon.
Male privilege is being labelled guilty and made a social pariah because of a false rape allegation, both in court and in the living neighborhoods.
Male privilege is being forced to pay child support, even if you have the child the majority of the time.
Male privilege is being labelled vile and evil, even if just for standing while peeing or sitting on a tram with your legs spread.
Male privilege is having a shorter life expectancy than women, but the demand that you work 5 years longer before you retire.
Male privilege is being more likely to commit suicide, be homeless, be denied welfare, be denied child custody, and having to fear commitment because 75% of women are the instigators in divorce.
Male privilege is having to deal with the hypocrisy of Post Modernism (demands men look good, are insulted for wanted physically appealing partners, etc).
Male privilege is contending with 93% of industrial and work related deaths and injuries.
Male privilege is being told to be quiet, that you are not allowed to have an opinion, even when people are shrieking agreement that we need to get rid of Father's Day or Kill all Cis Men or have a National Castration Day.
Male privilege is being circumcised when you are too young to be able to protest and none of the women complain, but the circumcision of females at any age is considered 'cruel and barbaric'.
Male privilege is being told that men need to 'stop the cycle of violence', despite studies showing that middle class women hit their children 932 times a year, the children being between 7 months old and 4 years old.
Male privilege is being forced to accept male disposabilty as a reasonable social requirement (Women and children first, while many men on the Titanic died).
Male privilege is having to listen to women screaming 'check your privilege', despite the prejudice it entails.
Male privilege is being mistreated by radical feminists and told by everyone else 'That's not what feminism is about', before being denied the rights given to women.
Male privilege is being ignored by 86% of the people you turn to if you are sexually assaulted, molested, or raped.
Male privilege is being labelled a psychopath and hate-monger if you join an MRA group for support in times of stress, but when women join a radical feminist group preaching free-bleeding and castration, it's considered empowering.
Male privilege is being told you aren't allowed to cry by a woman, and then told she's leaving you because you don't show your emotions.
Male privilege is having to accept a 14 year old boy being raped by his female teacher, and the dismissal of her trial, as 'acceptable'.
Male privilege is being forced to sign up for the draft.
Male privilege is being denied access to your children, and your home, if the woman in your life deems you a threat (whether this is true or not has shown to be of little concern of the courts).
Male privilege is not being allowed to sit next to children on British Airways or Virgin airlines.
Male privilege is being unable to recover losses to himself or his business from the government due to his gender.
Male privilege is having NO say in whether a child can be put up for adoption.
Male privilege is being terrified of hooking up while out at a bar for fear of being accused of 'date raping' his partner.
Male privilege is being considered privileged for having a sexual preference.
Male privilege is being forced into the role of a negative stereotype, and condemned for attempting to correct the false accusations of society.
Male privilege is being denied the right to apply for Federal Child Benefits in Canada unless you get a written note from the mother.
Male privilege is being called 'lazy around the house', despite a 2013 meta-analysis of the American Time Use survey, Pew Survey, and a nationally representative sample of 2511 adults finding that, between genders, housework is carried out equally.
Male privilege is being fined over $20,000 and facing a year in prison in France for a male soliciting a paternity test.
Male privilege is not having a say in the termination of an unwanted pregnancy.
Male privilege is bogus.
The List of Things the Tech Priest is No Longer Allowed to Do In Dark Heresy
The tech priest is not allowed to quote Emperor Palpatine every time she uses Luminen Shock.
The tech priest will refrain from yelling binary across the table at other gamers.
Dubstep is not an appropriate way to pass a Fellowship check with another tech priest.
The tech priest will not have a slap fight with the Assassin character after receiving above average quality augmetic arms and will incur all costs for his medical treatment if this goes ahead.
The Mimic Talent is a privilege, not a right.
The tech priest will not have their arms replaces with augments, put on a stylised face mask and stomp about electrocuting people yelling “DELETE! DELETE!”.
Collecting a bunch of metal dildos and using Ferric Lure or other talents to impale enemies is not a valid ballistic OR melee attack.
The tech priest will not communicate in hashtags. Or tweets. Or memes.
Tech Knock does not require the tech priest to disrobe at any stage of the Rite.
There is never an appropriate time to deliver “Surprise Slaught” with a medical mechadendrite.
Walking up behind an enemy PC and saying “You’re working too hard”, followed by shocking him to death will result in the forfeiture of xp.
Just because you have the Disturbing Voice Trait does not mean you automatically sound like a Dalek. Or Christopher Lee.
The tech priest will not get into the Walker and charge the enemy monster shouting “Get away from her you bitch!”.
The tech priest does not have a gadget belt. Or a gadget butt.
No, you don’t have a mechadendrite for that.
The tech priest will not communicate in indecipherable beeps and whistles, or in a metallic British accent.
Security feed hacking is for missions, not for personal use.
Tech priests do not use Ferric Lure to remove Sister of Battle armour.
Maglev Grace/Transcen
Tech priests do NOT have neurotoxin grenades, and their MIU controlled servitors do NOT say “Dispensing product” before firing.
You will not call your servo skull “Johnson”.